httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henri Gomez <hgo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Why Redhat 8.0 / 9.0 still use 2.0.40 (+ security fixes)
Date Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:50:47 GMT
Mark J Cox wrote:
>>For those who wonder why Redhat didn't update Apache 2.0 in distro
>>8.0 and 9.0, just read :
>>
>>http://www.redhat.com/advice/speaks_backport.html
> 
> 
> Apache httpd was an example that I happened to remember when writing that
> explanation - Apache is far from the worst offender to mix security
> updates with other changes in a new release ;)
> 

Hi Mark,

I understand your concern, and also the quantity of works to release
all the related modules (php, mod_perl...), but there is many users
who need latest Apache 2.0 since they have to use extended 
functionnalities (ie mod_deflate logs) or because some modules
need them.

The problem we encountered in mod_jk was that in 2.0.40 there is
no support for apxs -q LIBTOOL and so users couldn't built mod_jk 1.2.4
under Redhat 8.0 or 9.0 (I sent a TRICK to tomcat-dev and tomcat-user 
lists to overcome this limitation).

I get a least one mail by day from happy users for my 'alternate apache 
rpm' provided at falsehope.com (apache 2.0.46 with mpm).

http://rpmfind.net//linux/RPM/falsehope/home/gomez/apache2/apache2-2.0.46-1.7.2.i386.html


Regards



Mime
View raw message