httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From harald deppeler <har...@deppeler.org>
Subject httpd-2.0.46 needs gcc_s? (on solaris 8)
Date Thu, 05 Jun 2003 09:18:52 GMT
We're upgrading from 2.0.44 to 2.0.46 and have noticed that the httpd
binary now seems to need libgcc_s.

# ldd /some/path/httpd
        libaprutil-0.so.0 =>     /some/path/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0
        libexpat.so.0 =>         /some/path/lib/libexpat.so.0
        libapr-0.so.0 =>         /some/path/lib/libapr-0.so.0
        librt.so.1 =>    /usr/lib/librt.so.1
        libm.so.1 =>     /usr/lib/libm.so.1
        libsocket.so.1 =>        /usr/lib/libsocket.so.1
        libnsl.so.1 =>   /usr/lib/libnsl.so.1
        libresolv.so.2 =>        /usr/lib/libresolv.so.2
        libdl.so.1 =>    /usr/lib/libdl.so.1
        libpthread.so.1 =>       /usr/lib/libpthread.so.1
        libc.so.1 =>     /usr/lib/libc.so.1
        libgcc_s.so.1 =>         (file not found)
        libgcc_s.so.1 =>         (file not found)
        libgcc_s.so.1 =>         (file not found)
        libaio.so.1 =>   /usr/lib/libaio.so.1
        libmp.so.2 =>    /usr/lib/libmp.so.2
        libthread.so.1 =>        /usr/lib/libthread.so.1
        /usr/platform/SUNW,Ultra-250/lib/libc_psr.so.1
#


Our build systems have gcc (3.2.1) and other development tools
installed. Our roll-out systems are stripped down and contain no
such libraries, compilers or tools.

What would be the recommended way to roll out our 2.0.46 package? Include
libgcc_s with it? Roll out an "Apache>2.0.44" supporting package including
the necessary lib(s)? Configure Apache in such a way that it doesn't
use libgcc_s? How would we do the latter (preferred)?

Cheers - Harry

Mime
View raw message