Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 13074 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2003 08:20:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 13042 invoked from network); 21 May 2003 08:20:21 -0000 From: "Sander Striker" To: Subject: RE: Tagged the tree Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 10:20:33 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <2147483647.1053475465@[10.0.1.27]> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:justin@erenkrantz.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 9:04 AM > --On Tuesday, May 20, 2003 1:06 AM +0200 Sander Striker > wrote: > > > I just tagged the tree with STRIKER_2_0_46_PRE1. Please test. > > Looks good here with APACHE_2_0_BRANCH (passes httpd-test on Solaris). > > I backported into APACHE_2_0_BRANCH all outstanding patches that had 3 +1s and > no negative or neutral votes in STATUS. No idea if you want to pick those up > before .46 or not. My position is that I think we should as they all had 3 > +1s so we should be about as confident as we ever will on their quality - but > it is ultimately your call as RM. My position is that anything that is in now should go into 2.0.46. But, that is mostly because the patches that went in since the tag don't make me nervous ;). > The two changes I'd like to see in .46 that aren't in APACHE_2_0_BRANCH yet is > the mod_dav MKACTIVITY fix I agree on this one. > and the apxs changes so that we work with out-of-tree APR and APR-util. I've > added both of them to httpd-2.0's STATUS. If two people other than me +1 it, I'll include it. Sander