httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sander Striker" <stri...@apache.org>
Subject RE: Tagged the tree
Date Wed, 21 May 2003 08:20:33 GMT
> From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:justin@erenkrantz.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 9:04 AM

> --On Tuesday, May 20, 2003 1:06 AM +0200 Sander Striker <striker@apache.org> 
> wrote:
> 
> > I just tagged the tree with STRIKER_2_0_46_PRE1.  Please test.
> 
> Looks good here with APACHE_2_0_BRANCH (passes httpd-test on Solaris).
> 
> I backported into APACHE_2_0_BRANCH all outstanding patches that had 3 +1s and 
> no negative or neutral votes in STATUS.  No idea if you want to pick those up 
> before .46 or not.  My position is that I think we should as they all had 3 
> +1s so we should be about as confident as we ever will on their quality - but 
> it is ultimately your call as RM.

My position is that anything that is in now should go into 2.0.46.  But, that
is mostly because the patches that went in since the tag don't make me nervous ;).
 
> The two changes I'd like to see in .46 that aren't in APACHE_2_0_BRANCH yet is 
> the mod_dav MKACTIVITY fix

I agree on this one.

> and the apxs changes so that we work with out-of-tree APR and APR-util.  I've
> added both of them to httpd-2.0's STATUS. 

If two people other than me +1 it, I'll include it.


Sander

Mime
View raw message