httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Trawick <>
Subject Re: derived files in CVS?
Date Sat, 03 May 2003 18:27:08 GMT
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> At 09:10 AM 5/3/2003, Ben Laurie wrote:
>>Why are modules/ssl/ssl_expr_parse.c, modules/ssl/ssl_expr_parse.h and
>>modules/ssl/ssl_expr_scan.c in CVS? They're all generated from other files.
> Because we don't expect the user to have bison/lex/yacc handy.

We don't put configure in CVS either; the person rolling the tarball has 
to have the right tools on their machine to generate it.

Is it reasonable to do the same for the SSL scanner/parser?  It is a bit 
of a drag when they're regenerated locally and then dominate cvs diff 

View raw message