Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 97443 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2003 13:31:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 97376 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2003 13:31:52 -0000 Message-ID: <3E917DB2.3040801@sharp.fm> Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 15:31:30 +0200 From: Graham Leggett User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux ppc; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030318 X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en-za, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server scoreboard.c References: <20030405194802.55314.qmail@icarus.apache.org> <3E8F5454.6050707@attglobal.net> In-Reply-To: <3E8F5454.6050707@attglobal.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Jeff Trawick wrote: > If you'd tried to put this in 2.1-dev first, you'd have noticed that > Martin coded the same change with slightly different wording 12 days ago. I did notice - but I left it, as the change was already there. Didn't think the wording was that important. I think though that simple changes like this one (clarifying an error message) should always be made to both v2.0 and v2.1 (unless the code in each tree is radiacally different). If the fix had been ported to v2.0, it would have saved me a lot of headaches. > Can you pick whichever message flavor you like and get them in synch > pretty please? Will do. Regards, Graham -- ----------------------------------------- minfrin@sharp.fm "There's a moon over Bourbon Street tonight..."