httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Trawick <traw...@attglobal.net>
Subject Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/http http_protocol.c
Date Tue, 15 Apr 2003 19:29:37 GMT
Erik Abele wrote:
> Huh? I thought it was mostly R-T-C on the *stable* 2.0 branch? Did I 
> miss something or did you mix up 2.0/2.1?

Yes I am a moron.  Put "R-T-C" everywhere I put "C-T-R".

Sorry.

> 
> According to STATUS r1.750 it was voted: "In pratical terms, this 
> implies C-T-R-T-C, where patches are (generally) first applied to the 
> development branch, tested, and then (after vote) applied to the stable 
> branch." and there's also another vote in the current STATUS indicating 
> the same process...
> 
> Since this is not the first time this question was raised, I think we 
> should finally clarify *and* document this. IMO, a good place could be 
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/guidelines.html (section 'When to Commit a 
> Change'). I'll do this if there is a final decision and I can get some 
> spare cycles...
> 
> Cheers,
> Erik
> 
> Jeff Trawick wrote:
> 
>> Graham Leggett wrote:
>>
>>> Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd appreciate it if you could clarify the position on the v2.0 
>>> branch with regards to:
>>
>>
>>> - trivial bugfixes
>>
>> C-T-R
> 
> C-T-R ?
> 
>>
>>> - non trivial bugfixes
>>
>> C-T-R
> 
> R-T-C ?
> 
>>
>>> - added features
>>
>> C-T-R
> 
> R-T-C ?
> 
>>
>>> - formatting changes
>>
>> I don't know.
> 
> no code change = no problem ?
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message