Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Assuming I'm not blind and there really wasn't a review:
>
> Was this committed directly to 2.0.46-dev because:
>
> a) you're not familiar with the process
Quite possibly.
> b) you can't be troubled to follow the process we collectively chose
It would be better to clarify that process. The dev list generates a lot
of mail, and the list of committers is very long. It is quite possible
that people such as myself are not fully aware of changes to the process.
> c) the change is so simple that of course nobody who voted to pre-review
> was talking about simple things like this
It's a trivial bugfix. If there was a problem with the fix, I expected
to see followups such as yours.
I'd appreciate it if you could clarify the position on the v2.0 branch
with regards to:
- trivial bugfixes
- non trivial bugfixes
- added features
- formatting changes
Regards,
Graham
--
-----------------------------------------
minfrin@sharp.fm "There's a moon
over Bourbon Street
tonight..."
|