httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Steve Sabljak <steve.sabl...@bbc.co.uk>
Subject RE: Apache 2.0.45 -alpha tarball candidates for testing
Date Tue, 01 Apr 2003 12:49:37 GMT
The CGI daemon still dies with a SIGSEGV on Solaris 8, worker mpm. Here's a
backtrace.

 ffffffff7e100ae8 memset (0, 0, 504f5354202f6368, ffffffffffffffc0,
504f5354202f6340, 0) + 114
 ffffffff7c404784 get_req (9, 10020eaa0, ffffffff7ffff810, ffffffff7ffff808,
ffffffff7ffff770, 10020ed61) + 45c
 ffffffff7c40545c cgid_server (1002102a8, 10012c118, 0, 0, 0, 0) + 55c
 ffffffff7c405b8c cgid_init (10012c118, 100156268, 10012e128, 10015b7a8,
1001f72b0, 0) + 21c
 000000010006af54 ap_run_post_config (10012c118, 100156268, 10012e128,
10015b7a8, 0, 0) + b4
 00000001000766ec main (3, ffffffff7ffffcf8, ffffffff7ffffd18, 0, 0,
100000000) + 100c
 000000010004f7fc _start (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) + 17c

And here is a memory dump of the cgid_req_t passed to get_req (100 bytes)

0xffffffff7ffff770:      0x00000001 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x000003c6
0xffffffff7ffff780:      0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000
0xffffffff7ffff790:      0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000052
0xffffffff7ffff7a0:      0x00000000 0x0000002e 0x00000000 0x0000000c
0xffffffff7ffff7b0:      0x00000000 0x00000022 0x00000000 0x00000000
0xffffffff7ffff7c0:      0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000004 0x00000000
0xffffffff7ffff7d0:      0x00000001 0x00210238 0x00000001 0x0020ed40
0xffffffff7ffff7e0:      0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000001 0x0020eaa0
0xffffffff7ffff7f0:      0x00000001 0x00000004 0x00000004 0x00000004
0xffffffff7ffff800:      0x00000001 0x002107d8 0x00000001 0x0020f118
0xffffffff7ffff810:      0x00000001 0x0020f0d8 0x00000000 0x00000002
0xffffffff7ffff820:      0x00000001 0x0020ca90 0x00000001 0x0015e088
0xffffffff7ffff830:      0x00000001 0x0015b7a8 0x00000001 0x0020ea38
0xffffffff7ffff840:      0x00000010 0x00000012 0x00000000 0x00000009
0xffffffff7ffff850:      0x00000008 0x00000001 0x00000000 0x00000000
0xffffffff7ffff860:      0x00000000 0x0000736f 0x636b0000 0x00000000
0xffffffff7ffff870:      0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000
0xffffffff7ffff880:      0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000
0xffffffff7ffff890:      0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000
0xffffffff7ffff8a0:      0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000
0xffffffff7ffff8b0:      0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000
0xffffffff7ffff8c0:      0x00000000 0x0012c118 0x00000001 0x0015b7a8
0xffffffff7ffff8d0:      0x00000001 0x0015b7a8 0xffffffff 0x7c50c0b8
0xffffffff7ffff8e0:      0x00000000 0x00000000 0xffffffff 0x7c409ff0
0xffffffff7ffff8f0:      0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000

cheers,
Steve

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	William A. Rowe, Jr. [SMTP:wrowe@rowe-clan.net]
> Sent:	Monday, March 31, 2003 8:56 AM
> To:	dev@httpd.apache.org; stable-testers@httpd.apache.org
> Subject:	Apache 2.0.45 -alpha tarball candidates for testing
> 
> The release tarball (and win32 .zip file) are now available for testing
> from;
> 
>   http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
> 
> Please test this 2.0.45-alpha candidate for general release within the 
> next 24 hours.  Once the dev@ list receives enough positive feedback,
> we will release the files to general availability, moving them to their
> usual 
> locations.  This code has been in place for several days on the primary
> www.apache.org server, but we need a variety of platforms and different
> configurations to have complete confidence in the release.
> 
> Thank you in advance for participating in the testing, and thanks to
> both Brian Pane and Justin Erenkrantz who helped roll these out.
> 
> Bill
> 


BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/

This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain 
personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically 
stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do 
not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in 
reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the 
BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will 
signify your consent to this.


Mime
View raw message