Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Errors-To: <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030330010344.0238a990@pop3.rowe-clan.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 01:04:45 -0600
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 CHANGES
Cc: dev@httpd.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <1048996143.3325.30.camel@desktop>
References: <3E85E8F9.3050908@attglobal.net>
 <20030329163223.66208.qmail@icarus.apache.org>
 <3E85E8F9.3050908@attglobal.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 09:49 PM 3/29/2003, Brian Pane wrote:
>To bring everybody up to date on this issue...
>I re-tested forward and reverse proxying with this latest
>change, and both worked correctly.  Jeff did some research
>and found that the proxy error he encountered was due to a
>bad test case.

Yowzer... sounds like time for 2.0.45 if we could only figure out the cgid
resolution.  If we convert those ap_log_error() calls to fprintf(stderr...) I'm
guessing we can call this a wrap tomorrow.  Errr... make that today :-)

Bill