Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 96985 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2003 10:44:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 96907 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2003 10:44:02 -0000 Message-ID: <3E8427B0.1020607@attglobal.net> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 05:45:04 -0500 From: Jeff Trawick Reply-To: trawick@attglobal.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: MPMs and Future Directions References: <015b01c2f500$2e0e4f10$1600200a@hq.style.net> In-Reply-To: <015b01c2f500$2e0e4f10$1600200a@hq.style.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Spinka, Kristofer wrote: >>>6. Documentation. >> >>Apparently you are entirely unaware of the docs@httpd.apache.org team, >>and the fact that Apache's documentation is generally regarded as one >>of the better sets of open source docs? >> >> http://httpd.apache.org/docs-project/ > > > I was referring to documentation for developers, is this not the place > http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/developer/ ? If it is the correct > place it just seems a bit sparse. Use the source. There has never been extensive, official Apache developer documentation, yet there are large numbers of modules for Apache. Successful Apache module developers are accustomed to looking at the sources of the modules provided with Apache, and open source 3rd party modules, to know how to best use the Apache API.