Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 19373 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2003 17:16:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 19298 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2003 17:16:25 -0000 Message-ID: <3E663086.5030006@us.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 12:14:46 -0500 From: Allan Edwards User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030210 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/winnt child.c mpm_winnt.c mpm_winnt.h References: <20030304221552.17826.qmail@icarus.apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N >> +AP_INIT_TAKE1("WindowsSocketsWorkaround", set_sockets_workaround, NULL, RSRC_CONF, >> + "Set \"on\" to work around buggy Winsock provider implementations of certain VPN or Firewall software"), >> + > > > hey, no need to double code. AP_INIT_FLAG exists ;-) Well I guess that's just a matter of personal preference, I don't have strong feelings either way... took the cue from OtherBill. You might argue there is precedence for his style with Keepalive on|off. Any others think on|off is better dispensed with? Allan