httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Trawick <>
Subject Re: out-of-tree apr/apr-util httpd-2.0 (the real 2.0) builds
Date Tue, 11 Mar 2003 11:54:09 GMT
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

> I know not everyone monitors CVS logs.  I have backported the patch
> for not-in-srclib/ apr and apr-util trees.  Even the in-tree builds 
> however
> are vulnerable.  If those working in the APACHE_2_0_BRANCH would
> try cvs up and experiment with your preference if apr[-util] either 
> in-tree
> or out-of-tree, we would all appreciate it.

APACHE_2_0_BRANCH still seems to work for me fine (APR in tree or out of 
tree), so the backport looks good (but I will remain cynical for the 
next few days just in case).

View raw message