Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 29914 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2003 01:30:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 29900 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2003 01:30:50 -0000 Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 17:30:59 -0800 From: Justin Erenkrantz Reply-To: Justin Erenkrantz To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: layering mod_auth_digest and mod_python authentication in apache2 Message-ID: <2147483647.1044898259@dhcp31-150.ics.uci.edu> In-Reply-To: <20030211004227.M38353@cyan.com> References: <20030210233956.M30372@cyan.com> <2147483647.1044892521@dhcp31-150.ics.uci.edu> <20030211004227.M38353@cyan.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.0.0 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --On Monday, February 10, 2003 4:42 PM -0800 Paul Querna wrote: > Okay, so now the big question, how long do you think it will be > before Apache2.1 is released? 2 Months? 6 Months? 1+ Year(s)? > > I am willing to code it out for Apache2.1 assuming it will be > coming fairly soon, but if it is too far off, i will have todo it > another way. I'd hope within 3-4 months, but the real answer is, 'whenever it is ready.' I have a feeling we'd be better off with smaller more incremental changes between minor releases. (The aaa code has been there since last August, so I think it is reasonably stable.) I think we definitely have to have the APR situation straightened out before we can even consider a 2.2. Yet, perhaps I will roll a 2.1 release in the next few weeks just to get one out there. At ApacheCon, we discussed a way that we could backport the new aaa modules to 2.0, but I won't have the time to do that. If someone wanted to do that, it'd be goodness. (It wouldn't break backwards compatibility if done carefully.) The only major thing I'd like to see happen before 2.2 (and that I think is reasonable in that timeframe) is getting a handle on the mod_dav memory situation and cleaning up how it uses pools. I know some other people have thoughts for HEAD that they could get in in the next few months. -- justin