httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David Burry" <dbu...@tagnet.org>
Subject Re: story posted
Date Tue, 11 Feb 2003 17:20:02 GMT
2.1 was started so that 2.0 can remain stable from here on out instead of
changing the 2.0 API with every minor release, requiring everyone to re-port
their modules with every minor 2.0 release....  so the fact that 2.1 exists
is a very good sign for 2.0!

Dave

----- Original Message -----
From: "Harrie Hazewinkel" <harrie@lisanza.net>
To: <dev@httpd.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 2:30 AM
Subject: Re: story posted


> Hi,
>
> Following this thread, I was wondering what the majority thinks
> is a best way forward. Currently, not many modules are ready
> for Apache 2.0 regardless the reasons.
>
> But it seems already that work is done for Apache 2.1 and
> people have to port their module again.
> OK, the module API is almost equal, but to improve adaption
> first 2.0 needs to be an established entity and with 2.1
> the will have a bad signal/noise ratio.
>
>
> Harrie
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Author of MOD-SNMP, enabling SNMP management of Apache HTTP server
>


Mime
View raw message