httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Trawick <>
Subject Re: Adverse behavior from SIG_IGN for SIGHUP and SIGCLD???
Date Fri, 24 Jan 2003 11:53:29 GMT

T Ford wrote:

> So as far as apache is concerned, there shouldn't be a problem? 
> Because I grepped the code and saw places where it was putting signal 
> handlers in place at least for SIGHUP.  I was just wondering if by 
> forking and then ignoring the signal that it might cause a problem 
> with not having apache's signal handler in place.

You're playing with signal handling in your child process.  You don't
want Apache's signal handlers in place.

View raw message