httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: compromise on RTC vs. CTR for stable???
Date Mon, 02 Dec 2002 20:41:09 GMT
Sounds like lazy consensus under RTC to me :)

Aaron Bannert wrote:
> 
> Sounds good to me. I'd prefer adding "about four days".
> 
> I'm also assuming that you are only talking about big commits
> (anything other than a few lines). I wouldn't want things like
> typos to have to wait that long. This is grey area though,
> and it comes down to personal judgement...so I agree with
> these guidelines.
> 
> -aaron
> 
> 
> On Monday, December 2, 2002, at 05:44  AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> 
> > Since the relatively few people who voted left us at an impasse on
> > this, it seems appropriate to try to find a compromise.  (I've been
> > told before that something other than normal RTC-with-3-+1 vs. CTR
> > isn't the Apache way or something to that effect, but I don't see that
> > such concerns should stand in the way of each side giving up some
> > ground.)
> >
> > How about using this for the stable tree?
> >
> > To merge something from dev to stable (or fix it in stable if the fix
> > is specific to stable):
> >
> >   either
> >
> >      three committers (including submitter) state their approval
> >
> >   or
> >
> >      four days elapses with no objections
> 


-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
      "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
             will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Mime
View raw message