httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David Reid" <dr...@jetnet.co.uk>
Subject Re: compromise on RTC vs. CTR for stable???
Date Wed, 04 Dec 2002 12:45:40 GMT
Sounds like a reasonable compromise.

I'm not a huge fan of using STATUS for these things, but it's as good a
place as anywhere else.

david

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Trawick" <trawick@attglobal.net>
To: <dev@httpd.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 1:44 PM
Subject: compromise on RTC vs. CTR for stable???


> Since the relatively few people who voted left us at an impasse on
> this, it seems appropriate to try to find a compromise.  (I've been
> told before that something other than normal RTC-with-3-+1 vs. CTR
> isn't the Apache way or something to that effect, but I don't see that
> such concerns should stand in the way of each side giving up some
> ground.)
>
> How about using this for the stable tree?
>
> To merge something from dev to stable (or fix it in stable if the fix
> is specific to stable):
>
>   either
>
>      three committers (including submitter) state their approval
>
>   or
>
>      four days elapses with no objections
>
> An entry in the STATUS file for that period of time will be necessary
> to satisfy the second criteria.  Such an entry will often be helpful
> for satisfying the first criteria as well.
>
> --
> Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net
> Born in Roswell... married an alien...
>


Mime
View raw message