Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 5786 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2002 21:32:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 5767 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2002 21:32:08 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: jimpop@devsys.jagunet.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20021125150403.01ef5008@pop3.rowe-clan.net> References: <5.1.0.14.2.20021125150403.01ef5008@pop3.rowe-clan.net> Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 16:31:59 -0500 To: dev@httpd.apache.org From: Jim Jagielski Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N At 3:16 PM -0600 11/25/02, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >At 02:54 PM 11/25/2002, you wrote: >>jim 2002/11/25 12:54:59 >> >> Modified: . Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH STATUS >> Log: >> It appears that I am "unworthy" to have an opinion... > >How do you mean? Don't read between the lines in my comments; >backseat drivers *are* welcome, and you are one of the few who >actively pursue 1.3 bugs [which is goodness!] I think calling *any* developer (whether they produce massive amounts of code because they have the time or job that allows it; or someone that has almost no time, but still finds the time to code what they can and track down what they can) a "backseat driver" is incredibly insulting. Next you know we'll be counting CVS commits and LOC to see who deserves the title "backseat driver" and "frontseat driver". -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] jim@jaguNET.com [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson