Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sender: trawick@rdu74-177-063.nc.rr.com
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Review then Commit discussion
References: <A5C2E9E8-FF31-11D6-A8B6-000393B3C494@clove.org>
From: Jeff Trawick <trawick@attglobal.net>
Date: 23 Nov 2002 18:45:07 -0500
In-Reply-To: <A5C2E9E8-FF31-11D6-A8B6-000393B3C494@clove.org>
Message-ID: <m3ptsvu9z0.fsf@rdu74-177-063.nc.rr.com>
Lines: 32
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Aaron Bannert <aaron@clove.org> writes:

> On Saturday, November 23, 2002, at 02:08  PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 03:44:48PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> >> FWIW I agree with Jeff here.  I retracted the statement since JimJ,
> >> Cliff and Aaron all seem to want to err on the side of C-T-R.
> >>
> >> So count this
> >>
> >>   R-T-C:  Jeff, Will
> >>   C-T-R:  JimJ, Cliff, Aaron
> >>
> >> More voices are always welcome.
> >
> > I don't get your problem with R-T-C. we're doing so for all branches in
> > OpenBSD. our stable branches have maintainers, so if someone fixes a
> > bug he
> > thinks should go to stable he sends it to the stable maintainer and he
> > checks again before commiting. I do not see any developent slowdown
> > due to
> > R-T-C, but just a quality improvement.
> 
> We don't have any concept of code ownership within httpd, and therefore
> can't have official "maintainers" of portions of httpd.

substitute "anybody interested in looking over code for inclusion in
the stable tree" for "stable maintainer"

-- 
Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net
Born in Roswell... married an alien...