Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 1766 invoked by uid 500); 14 Nov 2002 16:08:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 1753 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2002 16:08:57 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: rdu74-177-063.nc.rr.com: trawick set sender to trawick@attglobal.net using -f Sender: trawick@rdu74-177-063.nc.rr.com To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: RFC: move mod_ext_filter to modules/filters now* From: Jeff Trawick Date: 14 Nov 2002 11:17:04 -0500 Message-ID: Lines: 28 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N *or after tagging 2.0.44; that distinction isn't important to me; I just want to get the ball rolling to move it out of experimental; OtherBill, if a tag is still imminent, then it will definitely move *AFTER* 2.0.44; there is no need to complicate matters; This module has been used successfully by a number of people in the time that it has been available in experimental. I think it is time to make it supported and available for --enable-modules=most so that it is present in a binbuild for Unix. Currently there are two open PRs for mod_ext_filter: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11978 (PDF generated in a filter not handled properly by IE; probably an IE issue, since we would chunk the response and a MS KnowledgeBase article says that IE requires a Content-Length header to deal with PDFs properly) http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14016 (ActiveState Perl CGI not seeing eof on stdin; whether or not this is a mod_ext_filter problem, we build mod_ext_filter by default on Win32 anyway) Is anyone against moving it to modules/filters for 2.0.stable? -- Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net Born in Roswell... married an alien...