Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 97038 invoked by uid 500); 26 Nov 2002 18:32:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 96879 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2002 18:32:42 -0000 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021126111826.03312c30@pop3.rowe-clan.net> X-Sender: admin%rowe-clan.net@pop3.rowe-clan.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 11:19:46 -0600 To: dev@httpd.apache.org From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." Subject: Re: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/ problem Cc: docs@httpd.apache.org In-Reply-To: <20021126133235.GA11085@kerna.ie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Nov 2002 18:32:36.0640 (UTC) FILETIME=[315B2200:01C2957A] X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N At 07:32 AM 11/26/2002, Francis Daly wrote: >I'm not sure if this should go to dev or docs, but I'll try here as I >suspect that it is due to a recent change by someone here. Sorry if >I've got this bit wrong. I'm cc'ing docs >The web page returned from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/ looks >strangely blank in my browser right now, almost certainly because >there are 10 "easily confused. That's my doing, certainly. Docs folks, would someone do the 'regen' magic to the xdocs/dev/ sources to regenerate docs/dev/ ? I brought the xdocs up to date yesterday after Justin pointed it out. Thanks.