Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 63378 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2002 19:01:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 63365 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2002 19:01:03 -0000 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021101125423.028b4600@pop3.rowe-clan.net> X-Sender: admin%rowe-clan.net@pop3.rowe-clan.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 12:56:31 -0600 To: dev@httpd.apache.org From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." Subject: Re: Splitting out ssl_engine_io.c? Cc: dev@httpd.apache.org In-Reply-To: <2147483647.1036117625@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Nov 2002 19:01:06.0488 (UTC) FILETIME=[082D7B80:01C281D9] X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N At 04:27 AM 11/1/2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: >I have a distinct feeling that it might ease our sanity if we split the SSL input and output filter code in ssl_engine_io.c into separate files. Between the input and output, or between the decoded text filter logic and the bio network filter logic? There seem to be four ways to slice it. >Or, am I just nuts? Perhaps a rename to ssl_engine_filter.c could also be goodness. (If OtherBill is going to revamp the output section, perhaps now is a good time to split it?) -- justin I'll keep them together till we are done, at least. We don't need more cruft in mod_ssl.h, in fact I was preparing to refactor *that* file into ssl_engine.h and mod_ssl.h, to the point where mod_ssl.h only contains public interfaces to our ssl module for folks to 'plug into' ssl. The other messy guts shouldn't be propagated into apache2/include/. Bill