httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Trawick <traw...@attglobal.net>
Subject Re: Review then Commit discussion
Date Sat, 23 Nov 2002 23:45:07 GMT
Aaron Bannert <aaron@clove.org> writes:

> On Saturday, November 23, 2002, at 02:08  PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 03:44:48PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> >> FWIW I agree with Jeff here.  I retracted the statement since JimJ,
> >> Cliff and Aaron all seem to want to err on the side of C-T-R.
> >>
> >> So count this
> >>
> >>   R-T-C:  Jeff, Will
> >>   C-T-R:  JimJ, Cliff, Aaron
> >>
> >> More voices are always welcome.
> >
> > I don't get your problem with R-T-C. we're doing so for all branches in
> > OpenBSD. our stable branches have maintainers, so if someone fixes a
> > bug he
> > thinks should go to stable he sends it to the stable maintainer and he
> > checks again before commiting. I do not see any developent slowdown
> > due to
> > R-T-C, but just a quality improvement.
> 
> We don't have any concept of code ownership within httpd, and therefore
> can't have official "maintainers" of portions of httpd.

substitute "anybody interested in looking over code for inclusion in
the stable tree" for "stable maintainer"

-- 
Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net
Born in Roswell... married an alien...

Mime
View raw message