httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bill Stoddard" <b...@wstoddard.com>
Subject RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS ROADMAP
Date Sun, 24 Nov 2002 02:24:08 GMT
> I think that R-T-C is the most likely way we'll get good reviews of
> code moved to the stable tree.

Jeff is speaking from his experience with 2.0 development and I would have to
agree with him in this regard. However, I think it is possible to maintain CTR
and ask committers to be more conservative in what they commit to the tree
before reviewing it on the dev list first.  That's how we ran the entire 1.3
development (I join about 1.3b1 time). By comparison, 2.0 (and recent 1.3)
development has been sloppy.

Bill


Mime
View raw message