httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bill Stoddard" <b...@wstoddard.com>
Subject RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS ROADMAP
Date Sun, 24 Nov 2002 02:19:52 GMT
> On Sat, 2002-11-23 at 12:19, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> > On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Aaron Bannert wrote:
>
>
> > > >   +    * The 'modules/experimental' tree will evaporate soon.  Anything
> > > >   +      in the development branch should be located under it's eventual
> > > >   +      home (such as modules/cache/.)
> > >
> > > There's no reason to remove this from the 2.0 releases. They are
> > > experimental not matter way, and if someone grabs a 2.0 tarball and
> > > wants to start hacking on experimental stuff, all the better!
> >
> > -1 to removing them from 2.0.  The modules are 'experimental' not just
> > because they are development projects, but more because we don't put the
> > same level of faith in those modules working as advertised as we do in
> > regular modules.  But some people are willing to take the chance and DO
> > use them in production!  We can't just snatch them out from under those
> > people.
>
> I agree: we should keep the experimental modules.
>
> The cache code is a good example of a beta-quality component
> that's getting a healthy amount of testing and feedback from
> users because it's available as an experimental subsystem in
> the stable release.

Exactly. I see the same thing with the cache code.

>
> Brian
>
>


Mime
View raw message