httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aaron Bannert <>
Subject Re: Review then Commit discussion
Date Sat, 23 Nov 2002 22:19:35 GMT
On Saturday, November 23, 2002, at 02:08  PM, Henning Brauer wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 03:44:48PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> FWIW I agree with Jeff here.  I retracted the statement since JimJ,
>> Cliff and Aaron all seem to want to err on the side of C-T-R.
>> So count this
>>   R-T-C:  Jeff, Will
>>   C-T-R:  JimJ, Cliff, Aaron
>> More voices are always welcome.
> I don't get your problem with R-T-C. we're doing so for all branches in
> OpenBSD. our stable branches have maintainers, so if someone fixes a 
> bug he
> thinks should go to stable he sends it to the stable maintainer and he
> checks again before commiting. I do not see any developent slowdown 
> due to
> R-T-C, but just a quality improvement.

We don't have any concept of code ownership within httpd, and therefore
can't have official "maintainers" of portions of httpd. If we
had more strict responsibilities, then R-T-C might work the way
you have described it above.

What will R-T-C give us that we don't already have right now?


View raw message