httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@apache.org>
Subject Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS ROADMAP
Date Sat, 23 Nov 2002 21:42:29 GMT
At 02:43 PM 11/23/2002, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>My own POV is that a R-T-C on 2.0 will almost ensure a very slow
>development environ on that effort. We haven't felt the need
>to do so with 1.3, so, unless the idea is that: (1) no one will
>be looking at 2.0 compared to 2.1 and therefore c-t-r is a noop
>or (2) we don't want a heathly development environ on 2.0. Neither
>option fills me with happy and warm thoughts :)

It's my understanding that 1.3 does operate on R-T-C.  Correct me
if I'm wrong (a pointer to a final determination would be nice.)

Bill


Mime
View raw message