Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 47067 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2002 17:07:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 47051 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2002 17:07:08 -0000 Subject: Re: RLimitNPROC behaviour question From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Malo References: <20021003012332.GA20263@rawbyte.com> Organization: TIMTOWTDI Message-ID: User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 19:05:04 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N * Daniel Lopez wrote: >> | Note: If CGI processes are not running under userids other than the >> | web server userid, this directive will limit the number of >> | processes that the server itself can create. Evidence of this >> | situation will be indicated by "cannot fork" messages in the >> | error_log.=20 > The directive refers only to the CGI processes, not the server > processes (the wording can be confusing) ok. In this case I'm going to remove the whole paragraph. Objections someone?=20 nd --=20 Gefunden auf einer "Webdesigner"-Seite: > Programmierung in HTML, XML, WML, CGI, FLASH < # Andr=E9 Malo # http://www.perlig.de/ #