Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 99063 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2002 07:53:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 99049 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2002 07:53:31 -0000 Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 00:53:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Ask Bjoern Hansen To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: A suggested ROADMAP for working 2.1/2.2 forward? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20021018005134.R38735-100000@miette.develooper.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Bill Stoddard wrote: > * Consider using the Linux versioning system... stable release is 2.x where > x >0 and x == even. Developmemt release is 2.x where x is odd. +100. The Apache HTTPd versioning system has been plenty confusing to people not following the httpd related ASF lists. Please make it stop. We did call Apache 2.0 stable, so the argument that 2.0 wasn't stable so 2.{even} should be unstable seems pretty bogus to me. -- ask bjoern hansen, http://www.askbjoernhansen.com/ !try; do();