Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 75915 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2002 11:23:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 75902 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2002 11:23:11 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: kurgan.lyra.org: gstein set sender to gstein@lyra.org using -f Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 04:25:31 -0700 From: Greg Stein To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Auth: Start the httpd-2.1 branch finally? Message-ID: <20021013042531.F8309@lyra.org> References: <20021012201752.GF4179@clove.org> <5.1.0.14.2.20021012185806.02a42e20@pop3.rowe-clan.net> <1034505567.5731.41.camel@bones> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <1034505567.5731.41.camel@bones>; from jstuart@computer-city.net on Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 06:39:28AM -0400 X-URL: http://www.lyra.org/greg/ X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 06:39:28AM -0400, Jeff Stuart wrote: >... > And now you want to create an Apache 2.1! Oy! Give the third party > developers a LITTLE bit of time to catch up. :) The presence of an httpd 2.1 would have *ZERO* effect on them supporting a 2.0 release. If anything, it would help in that we would no longer be changing 2.0 as much. So... I'm not sure that I agree with your statement above... Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/