From dev-return-33780-apmail-httpd-dev-archive=httpd.apache.org@httpd.apache.org Thu Oct 03 20:07:04 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 23178 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2002 20:07:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 23163 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2002 20:07:01 -0000 Subject: Re: RLimitNPROC behaviour question From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Malo References: <20021003012332.GA20263@rawbyte.com> <3D9C7E52.3040509@slive.ca> Organization: TIMTOWTDI Message-ID: User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 22:06:05 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N * Andr=E9 Malo wrote: > For example: >=20 > RLimitNPROC 1 >=20 > means in practise: a CGI program may send a mail by piping it to > /usr/lib/sendmail if there's no concurrent process, i.e. it runs > alone. whether that makes sense or not...dependant on > system/policies/etc., I think. > I hope, I don't spread nonsense here ;-) *harhar*. must be RLimitNPROC 2, of course... nd --=20 print "Just Another Perl Hacker"; # Andr=E9 Malo, #