Mailing list archives: October 2002

Site index · List index
Message list« Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Aaron Bannert Re: stable 2.0 trees Thu, 17 Oct, 01:43
William A. Rowe, Jr. Re: stable 2.0 trees Thu, 17 Oct, 01:44
Aaron Bannert Re: stable 2.0 trees Thu, 17 Oct, 01:50
Aaron Bannert Re: Process Creation, MaxRequestsPerChild, destroy child process Thu, 17 Oct, 02:04
John K. Sterling Re: ability to restrict scope of require directive to a single module Thu, 17 Oct, 02:48
Bojan Smojver [PATCH]: Counting I/O with FLUSH Thu, 17 Oct, 03:25
Rodent of Unusual Size [STATUS] (apache-1.3) Wed Oct 16 23:45:06 EDT 2002 Thu, 17 Oct, 03:45
Rodent of Unusual Size [STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Oct 16 23:45:10 EDT 2002 Thu, 17 Oct, 03:45
Justin Erenkrantz RE: stable 2.0 trees Thu, 17 Oct, 04:49
Bojan Smojver Re: [PATCH]: Counting I/O with FLUSH Thu, 17 Oct, 05:29
Bojan Smojver Re: [PATCH]: Counting I/O with FLUSH Thu, 17 Oct, 05:56
Thom May Re: stable 2.0 trees Thu, 17 Oct, 08:52
Jeff Stuart RE: stable 2.0 trees Thu, 17 Oct, 10:23
Jeff Trawick Re: [PATCH] mod_deflate with a static libz Thu, 17 Oct, 14:23
William A. Rowe, Jr. Re: [PATCH] mod_deflate with a static libz Thu, 17 Oct, 14:40
grega...@apache.org Re: stable 2.0 trees Thu, 17 Oct, 15:12
William A. Rowe, Jr. A suggested ROADMAP for working 2.1/2.2 forward? Thu, 17 Oct, 16:10
Johannes Erdfelt Re: perchild mpm Thu, 17 Oct, 16:26
Lukasz Engel Apache 1.3.27 bad (?) signal handling on Tru64 5.1 Thu, 17 Oct, 16:31
Jeff Stuart Re: A suggested ROADMAP for working 2.1/2.2 forward? Thu, 17 Oct, 16:34
William A. Rowe, Jr. [Vote] 2.1 fork near ready? Thu, 17 Oct, 16:42
Scott Hess Re: A suggested ROADMAP for working 2.1/2.2 forward? Thu, 17 Oct, 16:45
Jonas Eriksson SV: perchild mpm Thu, 17 Oct, 16:46
William A. Rowe, Jr. Re: A suggested ROADMAP for working 2.1/2.2 forward? Thu, 17 Oct, 16:48
Jeff Trawick Re: Apache 1.3.27 bad (?) signal handling on Tru64 5.1 Thu, 17 Oct, 16:50
Jeff Trawick Re: A suggested ROADMAP for working 2.1/2.2 forward? Thu, 17 Oct, 17:03
William A. Rowe, Jr. Re: A suggested ROADMAP for working 2.1/2.2 forward? Thu, 17 Oct, 17:08
Joshua Slive Re: A suggested ROADMAP for working 2.1/2.2 forward? Thu, 17 Oct, 17:11
Bill Stoddard RE: A suggested ROADMAP for working 2.1/2.2 forward? Thu, 17 Oct, 17:18
Jeff Trawick Re: A suggested ROADMAP for working 2.1/2.2 forward? Thu, 17 Oct, 17:26
Bill Stoddard RE: A suggested ROADMAP for working 2.1/2.2 forward? Thu, 17 Oct, 17:32
Sander Striker RE: [Vote] 2.1 fork near ready? Thu, 17 Oct, 17:42
William A. Rowe, Jr. RE: A suggested ROADMAP for working 2.1/2.2 forward? Thu, 17 Oct, 17:53
Joshua Slive Re: A suggested ROADMAP for working 2.1/2.2 forward? Thu, 17 Oct, 18:54
Jeff Stuart Re: A suggested ROADMAP for working 2.1/2.2 forward? Thu, 17 Oct, 19:16
Jeff Stuart Re: [Vote] 2.1 fork near ready? Thu, 17 Oct, 19:19
Justin Erenkrantz RE: [Vote] 2.1 fork near ready? Thu, 17 Oct, 19:22
William A. Rowe, Jr. RE: [Vote] 2.1 fork near ready? Thu, 17 Oct, 19:32
Thom May Re: [Vote] 2.1 fork near ready? Thu, 17 Oct, 19:57
Andrew Ho Re: A suggested ROADMAP for working 2.1/2.2 forward? Thu, 17 Oct, 22:47
Bojan Smojver Re: A suggested ROADMAP for working 2.1/2.2 forward? Thu, 17 Oct, 23:14
Bojan Smojver Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 ROADMAP Fri, 18 Oct, 01:35
William A. Rowe, Jr. Re: A suggested ROADMAP for working 2.1/2.2 forward? Fri, 18 Oct, 01:53
Johannes Erdfelt [patch] perchild MPM bug fixes (+ open problem) Fri, 18 Oct, 01:53
André Malo Why initial location walk? Fri, 18 Oct, 02:30
William A. Rowe, Jr. Re: Why initial location walk? Fri, 18 Oct, 03:35
Graham Leggett Re: Problem with cache+proxy and multiple brigade Fri, 18 Oct, 03:49
Glenn Re: A suggested ROADMAP for working 2.1/2.2 forward? Fri, 18 Oct, 04:06
Bojan Smojver Re: A suggested ROADMAP for working 2.1/2.2 forward? Fri, 18 Oct, 04:55
Bojan Smojver Re: A suggested ROADMAP for working 2.1/2.2 forward? Fri, 18 Oct, 05:43
Ask Bjoern Hansen RE: A suggested ROADMAP for working 2.1/2.2 forward? Fri, 18 Oct, 07:53
amit athavale [PATCH] Making mod_auth_digest work for all subrequets Fri, 18 Oct, 11:26
Bill Stoddard RE: Why initial location walk? Fri, 18 Oct, 12:24
Bill Stoddard FW: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server core.c Fri, 18 Oct, 13:47
William A. Rowe, Jr. Re: FW: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server core.c Fri, 18 Oct, 15:24
André Malo Re: Why initial location walk? Fri, 18 Oct, 15:37
William A. Rowe, Jr. Re: Why initial location walk? Fri, 18 Oct, 16:26
grega...@apache.org Re: Prefork MPM Question Fri, 18 Oct, 17:11
Justin Erenkrantz Concerns about suggested version strategy Fri, 18 Oct, 17:22
Jim Winstead Re: Concerns about suggested version strategy Fri, 18 Oct, 17:38
Paul J. Reder Re: A suggested ROADMAP for working 2.1/2.2 forward? Fri, 18 Oct, 17:39
Ask Bjoern Hansen Re: Concerns about suggested version strategy Fri, 18 Oct, 21:27
Jeff Trawick [1.3 PATCH^H^H^H^H^HBUG] chunked encoding problem Sat, 19 Oct, 00:40
Roy T. Fielding Re: [1.3 PATCH^H^H^H^H^HBUG] chunked encoding problem Sat, 19 Oct, 02:44
Roy T. Fielding Re: [1.3 PATCH^H^H^H^H^HBUG] chunked encoding problem Sat, 19 Oct, 07:39
Roy T. Fielding distributing encryption software Sat, 19 Oct, 09:56
Jeff Trawick Re: [1.3 PATCH] chunked encoding problem Sat, 19 Oct, 11:41
Pier Fumagalli Re: distributing encryption software Sat, 19 Oct, 12:10
Jeff Trawick Re: distributing encryption software Sat, 19 Oct, 13:35
Pier Fumagalli Re: distributing encryption software Sat, 19 Oct, 16:27
johannes m. richter Re: distributing encryption software Sat, 19 Oct, 16:38
Justin Erenkrantz Re: distributing encryption software Sat, 19 Oct, 16:40
johannes m. richter Re: distributing encryption software Sat, 19 Oct, 16:43
Jeff Trawick Re: distributing encryption software Sat, 19 Oct, 17:31
Bill Stoddard RE: FW: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server core.c Sat, 19 Oct, 17:54
Jeff Trawick Re: distributing encryption software Sat, 19 Oct, 18:50
Dan Kegel Can pipelined responses span tcp segments? Sun, 20 Oct, 00:43
Brian Pane Re: Can pipelined responses span tcp segments? Sun, 20 Oct, 00:59
Bill Stoddard [PATCH] Win32: Why explicitly futz with the file pointer? Sun, 20 Oct, 01:33
William A. Rowe, Jr. Re: [PATCH] Win32: Why explicitly futz with the file pointer? Sun, 20 Oct, 02:12
Jeff Trawick Re: [patch] perchild MPM bug fixes (+ open problem) Sun, 20 Oct, 15:36
MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) RE: distributing encryption software Sun, 20 Oct, 19:40
johannes m. richter RE: distributing encryption software Sun, 20 Oct, 19:46
Kai Risku [PATCH] Fix for bug #7617: race condition causes 3 second CGI delay Sun, 20 Oct, 20:42
Bojan Smojver Re: [PATCH]: Counting I/O with FLUSH Sun, 20 Oct, 21:24
Aaron Bannert Re: [Vote] 2.1 fork near ready? Sun, 20 Oct, 22:16
Aaron Bannert Re: [Vote] 2.1 fork near ready? Sun, 20 Oct, 22:20
Justin Erenkrantz Re: [Vote] 2.1 fork near ready? Sun, 20 Oct, 22:58
Aaron Bannert Re: [Vote] 2.1 fork near ready? Sun, 20 Oct, 23:22
André Malo multiple host headers? Mon, 21 Oct, 00:41
André Malo Re: Why initial location walk? Mon, 21 Oct, 00:46
Brian Pane Re: Variable passing in SSI Mon, 21 Oct, 05:10
Brian Pane Re: [PATCH]: Counting I/O with FLUSH Mon, 21 Oct, 05:20
amit athavale Re: Prefork MPM Question Mon, 21 Oct, 05:33
Bojan Smojver Re: [PATCH]: Counting I/O with FLUSH Mon, 21 Oct, 06:04
Ask Bjoern Hansen Re: [Vote] 2.1 fork near ready? Mon, 21 Oct, 06:09
Henri Gomez Adding SVG mime type to Apache 1.3/2.0 Mon, 21 Oct, 08:33
Henning Brauer Re: [Vote] 2.1 fork near ready? Mon, 21 Oct, 11:21
johannes m. richter Re: Adding SVG mime type to Apache 1.3/2.0 Mon, 21 Oct, 12:08
Lukasz Engel Re: Apache 1.3.27 bad (?) signal handling on Tru64 5.1 Mon, 21 Oct, 15:46
Message list« Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Box list
Dec 2009112
Nov 2009529
Oct 2009530
Sep 2009568
Aug 2009259
Jul 2009364
Jun 2009265
May 2009330
Apr 2009196
Mar 2009355
Feb 2009221
Jan 2009339
Dec 2008316
Nov 2008180
Oct 2008378
Sep 2008237
Aug 2008162
Jul 2008120
Jun 2008257
May 2008320
Apr 2008406
Mar 2008203
Feb 2008354
Jan 2008416
Dec 2007332
Nov 2007265
Oct 2007375
Sep 2007513
Aug 2007382
Jul 2007208
Jun 2007267
May 2007309
Apr 2007278
Mar 2007308
Feb 2007316
Jan 2007304
Dec 2006280
Nov 2006237
Oct 2006394
Sep 2006287
Aug 2006250
Jul 2006570
Jun 2006313
May 2006367
Apr 2006548
Mar 2006408
Feb 2006328
Jan 2006438
Dec 2005613
Nov 2005711
Oct 2005598
Sep 2005456
Aug 2005776
Jul 2005457
Jun 2005384
May 2005321
Apr 2005359
Mar 2005466
Feb 2005380
Jan 2005206
Dec 2004398
Nov 2004538
Oct 2004371
Sep 2004539
Aug 2004527
Jul 2004325
Jun 2004468
May 2004317
Apr 2004234
Mar 2004606
Feb 2004357
Jan 2004358
Dec 2003344
Nov 2003580
Oct 2003336
Sep 2003272
Aug 2003262
Jul 2003323
Jun 2003424
May 2003447
Apr 2003355
Mar 2003684
Feb 2003570
Jan 2003534
Dec 2002443
Nov 2002531
Oct 2002749
Sep 2002901
Aug 2002802
Jul 2002716
Jun 2002910
May 20021024
Apr 20021369
Mar 20021093
Feb 20021143
Jan 20021069
Dec 2001682
Nov 20011268
Oct 20011110
Sep 20011258
Aug 20011708
Jul 20011052
Jun 2001737
May 2001644
Apr 2001957
Mar 2001611
Feb 20011465
Jan 20011416
Dec 2000906
Nov 20001082
Oct 20001016
Sep 2000645
Aug 2000729
Jul 20001016
Jun 20001602
May 20001092
Apr 20001358
Mar 20001504
Feb 2000586
Jan 2000836
Dec 1999590
Nov 1999601
Oct 1999746
Sep 1999378
Aug 19991034
Jul 1999678
Jun 1999626
May 1999619
Apr 1999697
Mar 1999678
Feb 1999325
Jan 1999794
Dec 1998575
Nov 1998407
Oct 1998475
Sep 1998737
Aug 1998557
Jul 1998907
Jun 1998858
May 1998958
Apr 19981234
Mar 19981320
Feb 19981328
Jan 19981686
Dec 1997879
Nov 19971103
Oct 19971078
Sep 19971171
Aug 19971881
Jul 19971809
Jun 19971820
May 1997622
Apr 1997938
Mar 1997685
Feb 19971176
Jan 19971927
Dec 19961420
Nov 1996798
Oct 1996605
Sep 1996644
Aug 1996994
Jul 19961617
Jun 19961747
May 19961210
Apr 19961102
Mar 1996698
Feb 19961000
Jan 1996550
Dec 1995832
Nov 1995628
Oct 1995589
Sep 1995715
Aug 19951049
Jul 1995413
Jun 1995255
May 1995390
Apr 1995998
Mar 1995699