httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Johannes Erdfelt <>
Subject Re: [patch] perchild MPM bug fixes (+ open problem)
Date Mon, 21 Oct 2002 18:27:16 GMT
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002, <> wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> > Perhaps I misunderstood. The patch I had developed (which is broken
> > because of the problems with the accept lock) just didn't listen on the
> > socket if it has no chance of answering the query itself.
> > 
> > That's what I thought you meant, but reading what you said again I may
> > have misunderstood.
> Nope, that's exactly what I meant.  (see below)
> > Did you mean closing the client socket or the listening socket? Wouldn't
> > closing the client socket just cause the client to treat it as an error?
> Just close the listening socket in the child_init phase of the
> module.  You want to do this before you start accepting requests.  You
> could also do this by just removing the socket from the accept array.  The
> reason I like having the child close the socket, is that it eliminates
> a potential bad config.
> Consider the case where an admin configures the server to listen on
>, but he never assigns a child process to listen to that
> port.  If you just don't accept the connections, the user will hang
> forever.  If every child process, however, actively closes the sockets
> that it can't serve, then the client won't even be able to connect.

That's a good point too.

> > What I was thinking was to add an artificial limitation that you can't
> > share an IP:port pair across two different uid/gid's since that's the
> > only case you want to pass a connection.
> That limitation should already exist, although it may not.

That limitation doesn't exist either in the documentation or in the

I figured that was part of the point of connection passing. I know it's
also useful for passing between the siblings for a particular uid/gid
also, but why not just require 1 child per uid/gid and then not worry
about connection passing at all?


View raw message