httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thom May <>
Subject Re: [Vote] 2.1 fork near ready?
Date Thu, 17 Oct 2002 19:57:08 GMT
* William A. Rowe, Jr. ( wrote :
> At 02:22 PM 10/17/2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > The one main suggestion I have to OtherBill's rules is that the stable 
> > release tree of httpd should be under RTC not CTR.  This ensures 
> > deliberation on our parts for integrating items into the stable tree.
> I was laughing at calling the whole process CTRTC (commit to dev,
> review, then commit to stable.)  Doesn't slow anyone down from fixing
> bits in dev.  Then (preferably as a single unified patch after all the little
> bits settle down) post for vote to commit into stable.  This simplifies
> review, as all the bits can be worked and debated for days, weeks,
> months, as they relate to one big change, without constantly asking
> for votes.

This idea sounds brilliant, and exactly what is needed.

Thom May ->

< robster> SHIT
< robster> woody doesnt support devfs
< willy> devfs is FUcking Shit
< liiwi> willy: quick now! tell it to stop before it gets itself dirty!

View raw message