httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aaron Bannert <aa...@clove.org>
Subject Re: stable 2.0 trees
Date Thu, 17 Oct 2002 01:43:05 GMT
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 10:22:46AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Bill Stoddard wrote:
> > 
> > At the risk of racing too far ahead in this discussion, here is my
> > suggestion... 2.0.43 becomes 2.1 and the MMN major does not change for
> > subsequent 2.1 series releases (except for a compelling reason, eg a
> > security fix -requires- a bump).  Why 2.1?  No technical reason; purely a PR
> > tactic to telegraph to the user community we are putting a lot of focus on
> > maintaining binary backward compatability and to get rid of the *.0.* in the
> > version number (yea, to appease the folks who are allergic to 0's in version
> > numbers).
> > 
> 
> I like.

I also like, but I also think we should stick with the "even numbered
revisions are stable, odds are developmental" axiom.

-aaron

Mime
View raw message