httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thom May <t...@planetarytramp.net>
Subject Re: stable 2.0 trees
Date Tue, 15 Oct 2002 14:46:55 GMT
* Jim Jagielski (jim@jaguNET.com) wrote :
> Bill Stoddard wrote:
> > 
> > At the risk of racing too far ahead in this discussion, here is my
> > suggestion... 2.0.43 becomes 2.1 and the MMN major does not change for
> > subsequent 2.1 series releases (except for a compelling reason, eg a
> > security fix -requires- a bump).  Why 2.1?  No technical reason; purely a PR
> > tactic to telegraph to the user community we are putting a lot of focus on
> > maintaining binary backward compatability and to get rid of the *.0.* in the
> > version number (yea, to appease the folks who are allergic to 0's in version
> > numbers).
> > 
> 
> I like.
> 
Me too.

-- 
Thom May -> thom@planetarytramp.net

<spectra> Hello!
<spectra> What is the voting period? From Mar 24th until?
<asuffield> until the candidate manoj wants to win is in the lead
* asuffield ducks into the icbm shelter

Mime
View raw message