httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: stable 2.0 trees
Date Tue, 15 Oct 2002 14:22:46 GMT
Bill Stoddard wrote:
> 
> At the risk of racing too far ahead in this discussion, here is my
> suggestion... 2.0.43 becomes 2.1 and the MMN major does not change for
> subsequent 2.1 series releases (except for a compelling reason, eg a
> security fix -requires- a bump).  Why 2.1?  No technical reason; purely a PR
> tactic to telegraph to the user community we are putting a lot of focus on
> maintaining binary backward compatability and to get rid of the *.0.* in the
> version number (yea, to appease the folks who are allergic to 0's in version
> numbers).
> 

I like.

-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
      "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
             will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Mime
View raw message