Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 34201 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2002 16:07:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 34187 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2002 16:07:38 -0000 Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 12:07:40 -0400 (EDT) From: rbb@apache.org X-Sender: rbb@shell.ntrnet.net To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: compatibility with C++ modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N So I haven't really looked into how it works, but have you looked at mod_cplusplus? http://sourceforge.net/projects/modcplusplus/ Ryan On 6 Sep 2002, Jeff Trawick wrote: > At about the same time recently that I was doing horrible, > uncommittable hacks to the build to get Apache 2.0 to support C++ > modules on HP-UX, somebody wrote a PR against Apache 1.3 pointing out > the same issue I encountered: If httpd is to properly support C++ > modules, it may need to be linked with something other than the C > compiler front-end, depending on the compiler and the platform. > > Though we probably don't want to be in the business of pretending to > support C++ modules in general, they certainly work with Apache on > some platforms and we could at least make it simple for the user to > specify the command to invoke to link httpd. This would default to > the C compiler, but could be forced by the user to be g++ or aCC or > whatever. > > ????? --with-httpd-linker=g++ ????? > > -- _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org 550 Jean St Oakland CA 94610 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------