Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 17885 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2002 22:46:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 17868 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2002 22:46:25 -0000 Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 18:46:32 -0400 (EDT) From: rbb@apache.org X-Sender: rbb@shell.ntrnet.net To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Location of aaa rewrite In-Reply-To: <002701c2539a$eeee5160$0500a8c0@hb> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Chris Taylor wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > [ ] Check in aaa rewrite to 2.0. > > [X] Check in aaa rewrite to 2.1. > > My view is that it's important to keep 2.0 stable to attract new > users, and breaking things all the time won't help :) Can I ask a stupid question? What have we actually broken since Apache 2.0 went GA? Binary compatibility? How many functions? How many of those were APR and not Apache? Ryan _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org 550 Jean St Oakland CA 94610 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------