Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 10:32:43 -0400
Message-ID: <3D52BACF00016671@mta05.san.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <3D74C601.D45D949E@vlafo.be>
From: "John K. Sterling" <john@sterls.com>
Subject: Re: Vote: mod_jk connector in /experimental
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


>-- Original Message --
>Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
>Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 16:24:01 +0200
>From: Peter Van Biesen <peter.vanbiesen@vlafo.be>
>To: dev@httpd.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Vote: mod_jk connector in /experimental
>
>
>Point taken. I didn't think about that. The problem is that it is not at=

>all clear what should get in. Indeed, a repository would be a better
>idea, with an apache distribution with no modules ( or only the core
>ones ).
>

As I stated, many people expressed interest in this a few weeks ago.  I
would really LOVE to see some folks get together (i'll volunteer to help
out, but a member should lead the charge) and come up with an architectur=
e
for this - there are many obvious systems we could copy.  As a module aut=
hor,
it would be nice to have tighter integration with the core, without havin=
g
to become a part of the core :)

sterling