Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 28269 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2002 22:58:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 28246 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2002 22:58:20 -0000 From: Jim Jagielski Message-Id: <200209032258.SAA11530@devsys.jaguNET.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Location of aaa rewrite To: dev@httpd.apache.org Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 18:58:04 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: jim@jaguNET.com In-Reply-To: <20020903223451.GN16785@apache.org> from "Justin Erenkrantz" at Sep 03, 2002 03:34:51 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL5] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > > Please vote: > > [X] Check in aaa rewrite to 2.0. > [ ] Check in aaa rewrite to 2.1. > Lesser of 2 evils, IMO. Breaking backwards compatibility for the 1.3 community and the early 2.0 adopters is painful, but I think spreading resources towards a 2.1 tree is even more dangerous and painful. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] jim@jaguNET.com [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson