Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 51853 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2002 09:37:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 51840 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2002 09:37:04 -0000 Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 11:37:14 +0200 From: Henning Brauer To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: 2.1 repository? Message-ID: <20020902093714.GF31202@skywalker.bsws.de> Mail-Followup-To: dev@httpd.apache.org References: <20020830164728.GZ1657@apache.org> <20020830180406.E30059@chiark.greenend.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020830180406.E30059@chiark.greenend.org.uk> X-PGP-Key: 3A83DF32 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 06:04:06PM +0100, Tony Finch wrote: > The Apache project's dislike of branching seems slightly odd to me > given that it seems to work quite effectively over long periods of > time in the BSD projects. ACK. CVS branches work out just fine for us (OpenBSD). I don't see your problems with 'em. -- Henning Brauer, BS Web Services, http://bsws.de hb@bsws.de - henning@openbsd.org Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)