httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From r..@apache.org
Subject Re: instdso.sh - basename confusion
Date Tue, 24 Sep 2002 15:12:24 GMT
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:

> 
> > > And then try to install (on Solaris) a module as a .so:
> > >
> > > 	../a2/bin/apxs -i -n mod_foo mod_foo.so
> >
> > I would suggest looking at HEAD rather than 2.0.40 as I made changes
> > to instdso.sh to explicitly handle this case.  instdso.sh will now
> > emit a warning rather than error out if you pass it a non-.la
> > file.  -- justin
> 
> Nice ! Any way of -not- making it need the .la; or being able to do
> without it if it is lost ?

If you already have the .so, why would you use apxs?  The whole point of
apxs, is to build the module, and get it into the source tree.  If all you
are using apxs for, is to edit the config file, I would suggest that there
are better tools available for that job.

Ryan


_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom                        	rbb@apache.org
550 Jean St
Oakland CA 94610
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Mime
View raw message