httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From r..@apache.org
Subject Re: [VOTE] Location of aaa rewrite
Date Tue, 03 Sep 2002 23:17:10 GMT
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:

> > On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> >
> > > > On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Chris Taylor wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > > > Hash: SHA1
> > > > >
> > > > > > [ ] Check in aaa rewrite to 2.0.
> > > > > > [X] Check in aaa rewrite to 2.1.
> > > > >
> > > > > My view is that it's important to keep 2.0 stable to attract new
> > > > > users, and breaking things all the time won't help :)
> > > >
> > > > Can I ask a stupid question?  What have we actually broken since Apache
> > > > 2.0 went GA?  Binary compatibility?  How many functions?  How many of
> > > > those were APR and not Apache?
> > >
> > > Sure, both source and binary compatibility were broken numerous times.
> > > Check the PHP bug database for umpteen reports on each breakage.
> >
> > Okay, but how is that different from early releases of 1.3?
> 
> I don't know, but you asked the question which sort of implied that
> nothing had been broken.

Okay, I was actually trying to imply that while we had broken stuff, we
hadn't broken that much, and that some modules would actually still work
(Except for the MMN).

Ryan

_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom                        	rbb@apache.org
550 Jean St
Oakland CA 94610
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Mime
View raw message