httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sander Striker" <stri...@apache.org>
Subject RE: Tagged and rolled 2.0.41
Date Tue, 17 Sep 2002 18:45:30 GMT
> From: Greg Stein [mailto:gstein@lyra.org]
> Sent: 17 September 2002 20:31

> On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 12:56:21PM +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
> > > From: Mads Toftum [mailto:mads@toftum.dk]
> > > Sent: 17 September 2002 12:38
> > 
> > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 03:41:15AM +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > I've tagged and rolled 2.0.41.  Please test the tarballs found
> > > > at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ and cast thy votes.
> > > > 
> > > One very small issue when building (tested on solaris 8 sparc) with
> > > ssl_expr_parse.y in modules/ssl. Given that the timestamp on that file
> > > is newer than on the output files, then make wants to run them through
> > > yacc again. Looking at the timestamps it seems that ssl_expr_parse.y
> > > has been updated by buildconf. Updating the timestamp on the output
> > > files makes apache build cleanly without yacc.
> > 
> > Grmpf.  Should we modify httpd_roll_release to touch the output files?
> > 
> > Samder
> 
> Hey "Samder"... Yes, +1 on tweaking httpd_roll_release to touch the files.

Bah, I can't even spell my own name ;)
 
> I would also recommend a new tarball with the timestamp tweaked. Something
> like so:
> 
> $ tar xzf httpd-....tar.gz
> $ touch .../ssl_expr_parse.c
> $ tar czf httpd-....tar.gz httpd-...
> 
> That's gonna affect the tarball's MD5 signature tho.

And the PGP signatures.  Do I hear objections against that?

Sander


Mime
View raw message