httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sander Striker" <stri...@apache.org>
Subject Moving to 2.0.42? WAS: RE: Tagged and rolled 2.0.41
Date Tue, 17 Sep 2002 19:09:38 GMT
> From: Sander Striker [mailto:striker@apache.org]
> Sent: 17 September 2002 20:59

> > From: rbb@apache.org [mailto:rbb@apache.org]
> > Sent: 17 September 2002 20:44
> 
> >>> I would also recommend a new tarball with the timestamp tweaked. Something
> >>> like so:
> >>> 
> >>> $ tar xzf httpd-....tar.gz
> >>> $ touch .../ssl_expr_parse.c
> >>> $ tar czf httpd-....tar.gz httpd-...
> >>> 
> >>> That's gonna affect the tarball's MD5 signature tho.
> >> 
> >> And the PGP signatures.  Do I hear objections against that?
> > 
> > Just on the basic premise that the tarball has been released.  At this
> > point, it is available for users.  If we are going to create new tarballs,
> > then must have a new name.
> 
> *sigh*  Ofcourse you are right.  So, what do we do, stick with 2.0.41 or retag
> APACHE_2_0_42 to be the same as APACHE_2_0_41 and reroll?

Ok, maybe this is all a bit too much for a _timestamp_.  There were no
content changes.  So, if someone would be using 2.0.41 (before or after the
timestamp tweak), the code would be the same.  Since we haven't released yet
I would like to simply replace the existing tarballs and sigs.

Sander


Mime
View raw message