httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Van Biesen <peter.vanbie...@vlafo.be>
Subject Re: Vote: mod_jk connector in /experimental
Date Tue, 03 Sep 2002 14:24:01 GMT
Point taken. I didn't think about that. The problem is that it is not at
all clear what should get in. Indeed, a repository would be a better
idea, with an apache distribution with no modules ( or only the core
ones ).

Peter.

Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
> 
> Aye ! Well said.
> 
> Dw.
> 
> On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, John K. Sterling wrote:
> 
> > Here we go.....
> >
> > kitchen sink come on - we let a module into experimental (auth_ldap) and
> > suddenly experimental will become the CPAN of apache.
> >
> > I think this is a silly idea personally.  More cruft to maintain and to
> > hold back releases, etc. etc. etc.  Until Aaron's (et. al) idea of a module
> > registry/repository becomes reality, jk should stay where it is.
> >
> > sterling
> >
> > >-- Original Message --
> > >Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> > >Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 13:15:43 +0200
> > >From: Peter Van Biesen <peter.vanbiesen@vlafo.be>
> > >To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> > >Subject: Vote: mod_jk connector in /experimental
> > >
> > >Hello,
> > >
> > >I'd like to start a vote to get mod_jk in the apache core distribution.
> > >It seems silly to me to leave it in the tomcat distribution, what if an
> > >other container implements the protocol ? Moreover, the mod_jk is of no
> > >use to other webservers than apache and with the increased use of
> > >servlets, most apaches will use mod_jk anyway.
> > >
> > >Anyhow, let me know what you think !
> >
> >
> >
> >

Mime
View raw message