Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 7450 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2002 19:12:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 7421 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2002 19:12:52 -0000 Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 12:12:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Joshua Slive X-X-Sender: To: Subject: Re: [PATCH] httpd-std.conf changes to organize and support different languages In-Reply-To: <3D5005F3.6060008@attbi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Tue, 6 Aug 2002, Robert La Ferla wrote: > I was reviewing the language support in the default configuration files > and saw that a good number of major world languages were missing. I > added the languages and restructured things so that it's a bit easier to > manage. Also, perhaps all language related configuration should go into > a separate .conf file?? > > Robert > > Here is the diff to docs/conf/httpd-std.conf (from the 2.0.39 release) Thanks very much for your contribution. Here are a few comments: - Always use unified diff format (diff -u). We find it much easier to read. - The languages that are currently included in httpd.conf are all the ones where we have a corresponding "welcome" page (index.html.xx). This should no longer be necessary, since the welcome pages use a type-map file rather than multi-views. - Personally, I don't see the need to list all languages (or all major languages) in the config file. People who need a specific language should be consulting the relevant standards to find the correct codes. I would like to see less stuff in the language section rather than more. Thanks again. Joshua.