Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-32481-apmail-httpd-dev-archive=httpd.apache.org@httpd.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org
Received: (qmail 57926 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2002 06:03:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@httpd.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:dev@httpd.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org
Received: (qmail 57893 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2002 06:03:58 -0000
Errors-To: <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020825010241.031ecde0@pop3.rowe-clan.net>
X-Sender: wrowe%rowe-clan.net@pop3.rowe-clan.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 01:03:52 -0500
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
Subject: Re: dev question: apreq 2 as a filter?
Cc: Stas Bekman <stas@stason.org>, Joe Schaefer <joe@sunstarsys.com>,
        Issac Goldstand <margol@beamartyr.net>,
        apreq list <apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <3D6858D4.3090606@stason.org>
References: <Stas Bekman's message of "Fri, 23 Aug 2002 00:36:32 +0800">
 <m33ct8f3oe.fsf@mumonkan.sunstarsys.com>
 <200208212349.40583.chatgris@mediapow.com>
 <m3it23edez.fsf@mumonkan.sunstarsys.com>
 <3D647453.7030704@stason.org>
 <m3bs7vdjum.fsf@mumonkan.sunstarsys.com>
 <3D651310.3050008@stason.org>
 <5.1.0.14.2.20020822123542.02919dc8@pop3.rowe-clan.net>
 <m3n0red9g4.fsf@mumonkan.sunstarsys.com>
 <3D65AF9D.7060908@stason.org>
 <m3znveb2ld.fsf@mumonkan.sunstarsys.com>
 <3D65CA9A.4050706@stason.org>
 <m3sn16aywo.fsf@mumonkan.sunstarsys.com>
 <5.1.0.14.2.20020823035453.02bf93b8@pop3.rowe-clan.net>
 <3D6602E1.9070600@stason.org>
 <m3y9aw7ldj.fsf@mumonkan.sunstarsys.com>
 <036301c24bbb$59f45eb0$1a0aa8c0@deepthought>
 <m3n0rb7prc.fsf@mumonkan.sunstarsys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Just a quick observation.

The fact that the input filtering schema is a bit clumsy for apreq
is a perfect example of WHY we should incorporate apreq into
the Apache core.  Without a good use case, input filters will
never become as polished as they aught to be.

Bill